The Pitch alternative when slides meet a sales pipeline
honest verdict
Pitch is arguably the nicest way for a team to make slides together — real design system, real collaboration. But it optimizes the deck, and sales teams don’t send decks for fun: they send them to specific companies and wait. Naimi optimizes the waiting: personalization per client, links that report back, and pages that do more than advance on click.
Stay with Pitch if…
- Your team co-edits decks daily and lives in the slide format
- You present live (all-hands, keynotes) more than you send to clients
- You want polished team templates with brand controls in a canvas
Naimi fits better if…
- Every important deck is duplicated and hand-edited per client
- You want to know who opened what, when, for how long — with a ping
- You want calculators, package choices and payments in the deck
- You’d rather brief an AI than align text boxes
Pitch vs Naimi, without the fog.
Competitor pricing checked July 2026 — plans change, verify before deciding.
| Pitch | Naimi | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free tier; Pro ~$20/user/mo, Business ~$80/user/mo | Free plan; Pro $19/mo, Business $49/mo; self-hosted from $149 once |
| Free plan | Yes — limited | Yes — free forever, 5 seats & 3 templates |
| How you build | Pitch’s collaborative slide editor | Your own AI agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) or the web app — no new editor |
| Per-client personalization | Duplicate deck, edit manually | Core feature: fields per client, presentation ready in seconds |
| Interactive elements | Embeds, links; slide-shaped | Calculators, sliders, package pickers, payments, self-fill forms |
| Tracking & notifications | Link analytics on paid plans | Opens, view time, repeat visits + instant Telegram/email ping |
| Client memory across materials | None | Client card accumulates data, pre-fills the next material |
| API + MCP for AI agents | No public agent-grade API | REST API + MCP — agents can run the whole loop |
| Self-hosted option | No | Yes — one-time editions from $149, full source |
| AI cost model | AI features inside subscription | None on top — your existing AI subscription does the building |
Three differences that decide it.
01
The slide is a live-talk format
Slides exist so a human can talk over them. Send one without the human and it’s a brochure with page breaks. Naimi presentations are built for the unattended read: self-explanatory, interactive, personalized — because that’s how B2B decisions actually get reviewed.
02
Duplicate-and-edit doesn’t scale
In Pitch, “version for Acme” means copying the deck and hand-editing — every price update multiplies across copies. In Naimi the template stays single; clients get personalized instances in seconds, and template fixes propagate to links you already sent.
03
Collaboration vs conversation
Pitch bets on humans co-editing in a canvas. Naimi bets the canvas disappears: you describe, your agent builds, your team reviews a link. The craft moves from pixel-pushing to knowing what to say.
Migration is one conversation.
Export the deck to PDF or PPTX and let your agent rebuild it as a web template. Live-presenting still works — a Naimi presentation is fullscreen-friendly — but now the same asset survives being sent.
› here's our current pitch proposal (pdf attached).
rebuild it as a naimi template, personalize company + price
✓ template ready — 9 slides, 4 personalized fields
Pitch switchers ask us…
Can Naimi replace Pitch for sales decks?
Yes, and that is the sweet spot: decks that get sent to specific clients. You gain per-client personalization, real tracking and interactivity. For collaborative internal all-hands decks, Pitch’s canvas is still the comfortable choice.
Can I still present a Naimi presentation live on a call?
Of course — it’s a web page, it fullscreens beautifully, and interactive values you set during the call (sliders, selected packages) are saved to the client’s card afterwards.
Do I lose team collaboration by leaving Pitch?
You trade canvas co-editing for a different loop: anyone on the team can request changes in plain language, and templates live centrally so every manager personalizes from the same, current version.
More comparisons: Proposify · Qwilr · PandaDoc · Gamma · DocSend
Try the Pitch alternative on a real deal.
Free plan, no credit card. Rebuild your current proposal with your agent tonight — send a tracked link tomorrow.
free plan · no credit card · cancel anytime