The Qwilr alternative that keeps the pages, drops the editor
honest verdict
Credit where due: Qwilr proved a proposal should be a web page, not an attachment — we agree with them completely. The disagreement is everything around that page: Qwilr wants you building inside its editor at $35+ per user with no free plan; Naimi hands the building to your own AI agent and charges for the infrastructure — links, personalization, tracking, memory.
Stay with Qwilr if…
- Your team loves the Qwilr block editor and builds in it happily
- You rely on QwilrPay quote-to-payment flows tied to their plans
- You need their native e-sign + quote acceptance combo as-is
Naimi fits better if…
- $35–75 per user per month is hard to justify for pages you could own
- You want a real free tier, not a 14-day countdown
- You’d rather feed the AI your old deck than rebuild it block by block
- You want the option to self-host client data
Qwilr vs Naimi, without the fog.
Competitor pricing checked July 2026 — plans change, verify before deciding.
| Qwilr | Naimi | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $35/user/mo annual ($49 monthly); Growth $55 with 5-seat minimum | Free plan; Pro $19/mo, Business $49/mo; self-hosted from $149 once |
| Free plan | No — 14-day trial | Yes — free forever, 5 seats & 3 templates |
| How you build | Qwilr’s block editor (+ embedded AI assist) | Your own AI agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) or the web app — no new editor |
| Per-client personalization | Tokens/variables in the editor | Core feature: fields per client, presentation ready in seconds |
| Interactive elements | Interactive quotes, accept & pay blocks | Calculators, sliders, package pickers, payments, self-fill forms |
| Tracking & notifications | Yes — page analytics | Opens, view time, repeat visits + instant Telegram/email ping |
| Client memory across materials | Per-page; no accumulating client card | Client card accumulates data, pre-fills the next material |
| API + MCP for AI agents | API available on paid plans | REST API + MCP — agents can run the whole loop |
| Self-hosted option | No | Yes — one-time editions from $149, full source |
| AI cost model | Embedded assistant inside subscription | None on top — your existing AI subscription does the building |
Three differences that decide it.
01
Same destination, different vehicle
Both products end at a beautiful proposal web page. Qwilr gets there through its editor — blocks, styles, rules to learn. Naimi gets there through a conversation with the agent you already trust, starting from your PDF, your website, or a napkin photo.
02
Price of admission
Qwilr starts at $35 per user per month billed annually, with no free plan. Naimi starts at zero, and its paid tier costs about half — because we didn’t have to build and support a giant editor, and we don’t resell AI.
03
Whose infrastructure is it?
Qwilr pages live only on Qwilr. Naimi runs as managed cloud too — but the same system is available as a one-time self-hosted edition (from $149) when data residency or ownership matters. Your proposals shouldn’t evaporate with a subscription.
Migration is one conversation.
Point your agent at an existing Qwilr page URL or its PDF export: “rebuild this as a Naimi template, keep the structure, mark price and client name as personalized”. The visual style is rebuilt to your brand, not copied pixel-for-pixel.
› here's our current qwilr proposal (pdf attached).
rebuild it as a naimi template, personalize company + price
✓ template ready — 9 slides, 4 personalized fields
Qwilr switchers ask us…
Is Naimi cheaper than Qwilr?
Substantially. Qwilr starts at $35/user/mo billed annually with no free plan (checked July 2026). Naimi has a free-forever plan, Pro at $19/mo, Business at $49/mo, and one-time self-hosted editions from $149.
Does Naimi make interactive quotes like Qwilr?
Yes — package pickers, quantity sliders, live totals and payment buttons are standard interactive elements, and the client’s selections are saved to their card for your follow-up.
What does Naimi not have that Qwilr has?
A visual block editor — deliberately. If your team wants to hand-assemble pages in a canvas, Qwilr does that well. If your team wants to describe the outcome and let an AI produce it, that is exactly the workflow Naimi is built around.
More comparisons: Proposify · PandaDoc · Gamma · Pitch · DocSend
Try the Qwilr alternative on a real deal.
Free plan, no credit card. Rebuild your current proposal with your agent tonight — send a tracked link tomorrow.
free plan · no credit card · cancel anytime