---
title: "Pitch Alternative: Naimi — from team slides to per-client web presentations"
description: "Pitch perfects team slide collaboration; Naimi replaces the slide paradigm for sales: per-client personalized web presentations, tracked links, interactive elements, built by your own AI. Free plan available."
url: https://naimi.ai/alternatives/pitch
---

[Home](https://naimi.ai/)/[Alternatives](https://naimi.ai/alternatives)/**Pitch**

Pitch · presentation software for teams

# The Pitch alternative when slides meet a sales pipeline

verdict

Pitch is arguably the nicest way for a team to make slides together — real design system, real collaboration. But it optimizes the deck, and sales teams don’t send decks for fun: they send them to specific companies and wait. Naimi optimizes the waiting: personalization per client, links that report back, and pages that do more than advance on click.

## Stay with Pitch if…

-   Your team co-edits decks daily and lives in the slide format
-   You present live (all-hands, keynotes) more than you send to clients
-   You want polished team templates with brand controls in a canvas

## Naimi fits better if…

-   Every important deck is duplicated and hand-edited per client
-   You want to know who opened what, when, for how long — with a ping
-   You want calculators, package choices and payments in the deck
-   You’d rather brief an AI than align text boxes

side by side

## Pitch vs Naimi, without the fog.

Competitor pricing checked July 2026 — plans change, verify before deciding.

|  | Pitch | Naimi |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Starting price | Free tier; Pro ~$20/user/mo, Business ~$80/user/mo | Free plan; Pro $19/mo, Business $49/mo; self-hosted from $149 once |
| Free plan | Yes — limited | Yes — free forever, 3 seats & 3 templates |
| How you build | Pitch’s collaborative slide editor | Your own AI agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) or the web app — no new editor |
| Per-client personalization | Duplicate deck, edit manually | Core feature: fields per client, presentation ready in seconds |
| Interactive elements | Embeds, links; slide-shaped | Calculators, sliders, package pickers, payments, self-fill forms |
| Tracking & notifications | Link analytics on paid plans | Opens, view time, repeat visits + instant Telegram/webhook ping |
| Client memory across materials | None | Client card accumulates data, pre-fills the next material |
| API + MCP for AI agents | No public agent-grade API | REST API + MCP — agents can run the whole loop |
| Self-hosted option | No | Yes — one-time editions from $149, full source |
| AI cost model | AI features inside subscription | None on top — your existing AI subscription does the building |

what actually differs

## Three differences that decide it.

01

### The slide is a live-talk format

Slides exist so a human can talk over them. Send one without the human and it’s a brochure with page breaks. Naimi presentations are built for the unattended read: self-explanatory, interactive, personalized — because that’s how B2B decisions actually get reviewed.

02

### Duplicate-and-edit doesn’t scale

In Pitch, “version for Acme” means copying the deck and hand-editing — every price update multiplies across copies. In Naimi the template stays single; clients get personalized instances in seconds, and template fixes propagate to links you already sent.

03

### Collaboration vs conversation

Pitch bets on humans co-editing in a canvas. Naimi bets the canvas disappears: you describe, your agent builds, your team reviews a link. The craft moves from pixel-pushing to knowing what to say.

switching

## Migration is one conversation.

Export the deck to PDF or PPTX and let your agent rebuild it as a web template. Live-presenting still works — a Naimi presentation is fullscreen-friendly — but now the same asset survives being sent.

› here's our current pitch proposal (pdf attached).  
rebuild it as a naimi template, personalize company + price

✓ template ready — 9 slides, 4 personalized fields

faq

## Pitch switchers ask us…

**Can Naimi replace Pitch for sales decks?**

Yes, and that is the sweet spot: decks that get sent to specific clients. You gain per-client personalization, real tracking and interactivity. For collaborative internal all-hands decks, Pitch’s canvas is still the comfortable choice.

**Can I still present a Naimi presentation live on a call?**

Of course — it’s a web page, it fullscreens beautifully, and interactive values you set during the call (sliders, selected packages) are saved to the client’s card afterwards.

**Do I lose team collaboration by leaving Pitch?**

You trade canvas co-editing for a different loop: anyone on the team can request changes in plain language, and templates live centrally so every manager personalizes from the same, current version.

More comparisons: [Proposify](https://naimi.ai/alternatives/proposify) · [Qwilr](https://naimi.ai/alternatives/qwilr) · [PandaDoc](https://naimi.ai/alternatives/pandadoc) · [Gamma](https://naimi.ai/alternatives/gamma) · [DocSend](https://naimi.ai/alternatives/docsend)

## Try the Pitch alternative on a real deal.

Free plan, no credit card. Rebuild your current proposal with your agent tonight — send a tracked link tomorrow.

[Start free→](https://app.naimi.ai/app/signup) [See pricing](https://naimi.ai/pricing)

free plan · no credit card · cancel anytime